For anyone who worked in both countries, one rule used to shape that second story. The Windfall Elimination Provision Canada pension penalty cut US benefits for people who also earned a Canada Pension Plan income. That penalty is now gone, so the old assumptions in many executive plans are out of date. Treat what follows as background reading before a talk with a cross-border adviser.
Social Security pays a weighted benefit. Lower lifetime earnings get a more generous return per dollar than higher earnings.
That design created a problem for people with split careers. A decade in Calgary looked like a decade of zero US earnings. The formula then treated a well-paid executive as a low earner and paid the richer rate.
Congress responded in 1983 with the Windfall Elimination Provision. It trimmed the US benefit for anyone who also drew a pension from work outside the US system. The Canada Pension Plan counted as exactly that kind of pension.
A companion rule, the Government Pension Offset, reached spouses and survivors. Their US benefit fell by an amount equal to two-thirds of that public pension.
Non-covered work means a job that did not pay into US Social Security, such as employment in Canada.
The Social Security Fairness Act was signed on January 5, 2025. It repealed both the WEP and the GPO outright.
Three details matter most for a cross-border household:
Cardinal Point notes that cross-border workers can now receive full Social Security with no penalty for their CPP contributions. Each country still pays its own benefit from its own records. Ottawa and Washington still run separate programs.
The size of the gain depends on how a career was split. Four common executive profiles show the range.
The Social Security Administration still requires 40 work credits for a retirement benefit. You can earn up to four credits a year. A totalization agreement between the two countries can help people who fall short.
Most executive retirement models were built before 2025. Several of their inputs are now wrong.
Work through the review in this order:
Executives with a liquidity event coming tend to skip step five. A sale or IPO can change which claiming age makes sense. Owners who reach this stage often find it is time to bring in a CPA to work beside a cross-border planner.
It can. Before 2025, a Canadian executive weighing a US offer faced a hidden cost. Each extra Canadian working year could deepen a future US benefit cut.
That penalty no longer exists. Retirement value is now less of a drag on cross-border recruiting.
Boards and search partners can use this in three ways:
Personal advice still matters here. The repeal simply removes one obstacle that used to sit quietly in the negotiation.
A bigger benefit is still taxable income. For a US resident, up to 85% of the payment can be taxable under the rules for taxing Social Security benefits.
Residence decides much of the outcome. Under the Canada-US tax treaty, the country where you live generally taxes these benefits. An executive who retires to Muskoka and one who retires to Arizona will report the same check differently.
Canada's two pensions complicate things further. Higher combined income can trigger the OAS recovery tax in Canada. So the retirement plan needs one view of both countries, not two separate files.
Executive moves between Canada and the US will keep showing up in deal flow. The retirement side of those moves is now simpler than it was. Anyone with years in both systems should rebuild their numbers with a qualified cross-border professional before making a claiming decision.
No. The repeal ended the WEP reduction for benefits payable after December 2023. Your US benefit now uses the standard formula, whatever you receive from Canada.
Retroactive amounts followed the person's Social Security record, not their address. Anyone who lived abroad should still confirm the payment arrived and update their banking details.
Possibly. Before 2025, the offset often wiped out spousal checks for anyone holding a public pension from non-covered work. Those who were refused before should ask the agency to review their eligibility.
It depends on health, income needs and other assets. Delaying past full retirement age still raises the monthly amount, so model each option with a professional.